Skip to content

ADR-0021: Operational security certification

Proposed
Status

proposed

Date

2026-03-10

Group

cross-cutting

Depends-on

ADR-0016

Context

A sovereign cloud platform must demonstrate that it is operated securely on an ongoing basis — not just designed securely. Government customers need assurance around incident response, vulnerability management, change management, and availability. ISO 27001 (ADR-0018) covers some operational controls, but continuous operational assurance may require additional evidence.

Options

Option 1: ISO 27001 operational controls only

  • Pros: already covered by ADR-0018; no additional certification; Annex A includes incident management (A.5.24-5.28), change management (A.8.32), and vulnerability management (A.8.8)

  • Cons: ISO 27001 audits are point-in-time (or periodic); does not provide continuous assurance; less convincing for customers who want ongoing evidence

Option 2: SOC 2 Type II

  • Pros: covers a continuous period (typically 12 months); evaluates whether controls are not just designed but operating effectively; well-known format for operational assurance reports; covers security, availability, and confidentiality

  • Cons: US-origin (AICPA); additional audit cost; some overlap with ISO 27001; less recognized in European government than ISO

Option 3: ISO 27001 + SOC 2 Type II

  • Pros: ISO 27001 for European government recognition; SOC 2 Type II for continuous operational assurance; together they cover both design and ongoing operation of controls; strong signal to customers of all types

  • Cons: two audit tracks; higher cost; significant overlap in control domains

Option 4: ISO 27001 + ISAE 3402 Type II

  • Pros: ISAE 3402 is the international (non-US) equivalent of SOC 2; recognized in European audit context; provides continuous assurance over a period; familiar to European government auditors

  • Cons: additional audit cost; requires mature operational processes before meaningful reporting

Decision

ISO 27001 + ISAE 3402 Type II. ISO 27001 (ADR-0018) provides the baseline ISMS. ISAE 3402 Type II adds continuous operational assurance in a format recognized by European auditors. This avoids the US-origin SOC 2 while providing equivalent continuous assurance. ISAE 3402 can be pursued once the platform has been operational for sufficient time to produce a meaningful audit period.

Consequences

  • Operational processes (incident response, change management, vulnerability management) must be formalized and evidenced from day one — even before ISAE 3402 audit

  • Monitoring and logging must produce auditable records of operational events

  • ISAE 3402 Type II audit should be planned for after the first year of production operation

  • Control descriptions must be maintained and aligned with ISO 27001 controls to minimize audit duplication